High-Rise Straight Jean
Images
High-Rise Straight Jean
Details
https://www.torrid.com/product/high-rise-straight-jean/44460516.html
Item#
44460516
price:
Promotions
- Extra 50% Off
- Discount Already Applied
Final Sale, No Returns or Exchanges
Variations
-
color: two tone black$34.99
-
size: 28Size Guide
-
inseam: tall
Product Actions
How To Wear It
Rated 4 out of
5
by
Magondragon from
Really cute
When I first put these on i thought I would be so uncomfortable with that seam down the middle of my leg but after a while of wearing them you don't even feel it. I really love the way they look on me!
Date published: 2026-02-20
Rated 3 out of
5
by
Brok3nslipper3 from
Great but tight
I got a size 16. Im in between sizes of 16/18. I thought they would fit like my other "vintage" stretch jeans so I would go to my lower size. I tried them on and they were very tight on my waist. They are loosening slightly every time I wear it but I dont like feeling like I can't sit when wear them.
Date published: 2025-11-20
Rated 3 out of
5
by
Vmatth from
Not as expected
I loved the two tone black but the fit was not good. Would have been cute but the pant legs were incredibly wide.
Date published: 2025-10-27
Rated 2 out of
5
by
mommydukes from
NOT MY SIZE !!!!!!
when i ordered i wanted size 16 when i received they where size 10 i really like them butvi wanted them for a party
Date published: 2026-03-29
Rated 2 out of
5
by
Asia412 from
Terrible
Terrible, they fit like a boyfriend cut instead of a straight cut. To wide in the knee and leg area
Date published: 2025-11-01
Rated 2 out of
5
by
n_h_25 from
low contrast, poor fit
the difference in color between the light and dark is MUCH more subtle in person. The fabric was soft and not very stretchy so it bunched weird in the crotch. There was extreme back gapping above the butt and not enough fabric on the back rise, so it sat much lower than the front AND it didn't touch me. The seam felt super obvious along my leg, like i was sitting on something wrong. Not sensory friendly.
Date published: 2025-10-31
Rated 2 out of
5
by
Mz Ladybug from
No Thank You
The picture serves no justice. The pants look grey instead of black. Even the patch down the leg looks grey. They are very wide leg. I’m returning asap.
Date published: 2025-10-29
Rated 1 out of
5
by
Horrible pictures from
Waste of time
Extremely deceiving. These pants are very washed out and pale. Nothing like the pictures. I returned them as soon as I saw them. Total waste of time.
Date published: 2025-11-03
Rated 1 out of
5
by
ScreechingSloth1 from
Not As Described
It's so strange that others got these in a washed out grey, because mine look just like the picture. I have a lot of the same criticisms, however. But, let's start with the fact that I can only fit half my hand in the hip pockets, as you can see. Tiny pockets are almost as insulting as jeans with no pockets. While the short length of the pants was perfect for me to wear with boots (I'm 5'4"), and the fit is exactly as described - slim fit from hip to thighs, relaxed from knee down - I also had the weird bunching at the crotch. And let's talk about the waist. They're not high-wasted, as described. You can see here I'm wearing them with a pair of Torrid's high-wasted panties, and there's a good couple of inches showing. I also had the annoying gap at the back, and the "gap-proof elastic waistband" is a joke. There's barely any stretch to it, and clearly not enough to do what they're claiming. Also, as another reviewer noted, I was very aware of the seam running down the front and back, which is a sensory nightmare. I don't buy jeans very often, so I was really excited about these, but they're a huge let-down.
Date published: 2025-11-02
Rated 1 out of
5
by
Not These from
Not a good fit
Extremely wide and does not fit short in length. The short length is more like regular length. There is no sizing guide found on the website.
Date published: 2025-10-31
Rated 4 out of
5
by
Magondragon from
Really cute
When I first put these on i thought I would be so uncomfortable with that seam down the middle of my leg but after a while of wearing them you don't even feel it. I really love the way they look on me!
Date published: 2026-02-20
Rated 3 out of
5
by
Brok3nslipper3 from
Great but tight
I got a size 16. Im in between sizes of 16/18. I thought they would fit like my other "vintage" stretch jeans so I would go to my lower size. I tried them on and they were very tight on my waist. They are loosening slightly every time I wear it but I dont like feeling like I can't sit when wear them.
Date published: 2025-11-20
Rated 3 out of
5
by
Vmatth from
Not as expected
I loved the two tone black but the fit was not good. Would have been cute but the pant legs were incredibly wide.
Date published: 2025-10-27
Rated 2 out of
5
by
mommydukes from
NOT MY SIZE !!!!!!
when i ordered i wanted size 16 when i received they where size 10 i really like them butvi wanted them for a party
Date published: 2026-03-29
Rated 2 out of
5
by
Asia412 from
Terrible
Terrible, they fit like a boyfriend cut instead of a straight cut. To wide in the knee and leg area
Date published: 2025-11-01
Rated 2 out of
5
by
n_h_25 from
low contrast, poor fit
the difference in color between the light and dark is MUCH more subtle in person. The fabric was soft and not very stretchy so it bunched weird in the crotch. There was extreme back gapping above the butt and not enough fabric on the back rise, so it sat much lower than the front AND it didn't touch me. The seam felt super obvious along my leg, like i was sitting on something wrong. Not sensory friendly.
Date published: 2025-10-31
Rated 2 out of
5
by
Mz Ladybug from
No Thank You
The picture serves no justice. The pants look grey instead of black. Even the patch down the leg looks grey. They are very wide leg. I’m returning asap.
Date published: 2025-10-29
Rated 1 out of
5
by
Horrible pictures from
Waste of time
Extremely deceiving. These pants are very washed out and pale. Nothing like the pictures. I returned them as soon as I saw them. Total waste of time.
Date published: 2025-11-03
Rated 1 out of
5
by
ScreechingSloth1 from
Not As Described
It's so strange that others got these in a washed out grey, because mine look just like the picture. I have a lot of the same criticisms, however. But, let's start with the fact that I can only fit half my hand in the hip pockets, as you can see. Tiny pockets are almost as insulting as jeans with no pockets. While the short length of the pants was perfect for me to wear with boots (I'm 5'4"), and the fit is exactly as described - slim fit from hip to thighs, relaxed from knee down - I also had the weird bunching at the crotch. And let's talk about the waist. They're not high-wasted, as described. You can see here I'm wearing them with a pair of Torrid's high-wasted panties, and there's a good couple of inches showing. I also had the annoying gap at the back, and the "gap-proof elastic waistband" is a joke. There's barely any stretch to it, and clearly not enough to do what they're claiming. Also, as another reviewer noted, I was very aware of the seam running down the front and back, which is a sensory nightmare. I don't buy jeans very often, so I was really excited about these, but they're a huge let-down.
Date published: 2025-11-02
Rated 1 out of
5
by
Not These from
Not a good fit
Extremely wide and does not fit short in length. The short length is more like regular length. There is no sizing guide found on the website.
Date published: 2025-10-31
